Access and Mobility in Milton Keynes: An Inclusive Design History where Urban Planning Ideals and Design Intent Meet Disability Politics
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper offers the first inclusive design history of Milton Keynes, examining how the accessibility of Milton Keynes was conceived at the time it was planned and designed. Prompted by the recollection at interview that people with disabilities were encouraged to live in Milton Keynes because it was accessible, the foundations of this claim are explored through walkabouts, oral histories and documentary evidence. The study reveals ‘ease of movement and access’ as one of Milton Keynes’ planning goals and The Open University as the location for foundational arguments that shaped the social construction of disability. It is remarkable that the social model of disability and the injustice of inaccessibility surfaced in a city that was designed to enable mobility and access, although Milton Keynes in the 1970s is remembered as a place that attracted designers, academics, and activists interested in a more equitable future.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
All contents of this electronic edition are distributed under the Creative Commons license of "Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internacional" (CC-BY-SA). Any total or partial reproduction of the material must mention its origin.
The rights of the published images belong to their authors, who grant to Diseña the license for its use. The management of the permits and the authorization of the publication of the images (or of any material) that contains copyright and its consequent rights of reproduction in this publication is the sole responsibility of the authors of the articles.
References
Banham, R., Barker, P., Hall, P., & Price, C. (1969). Non-plan: An Experiment in Freedom. New Society, 13(338), 435–443.
Bendixon, T., & Platt, J. (1992). Milton Keynes: Image and Reality. Granta.
Blowers, A., Hamnett, C., & Sarre, P. (Eds.). (1974). The Future of Cities. The Open University Press.
Boys, J. (2014). Doing Disability Differently: An Alternative Handbook on Architecture, Dis/Ability and Designing for Everyday Life. Routledge.
Campbell, F. K. (2009). Contours of Ableism: The Production of Disability and Abledness. Palgrave.
Clapson, M. (2004). A Social History of Milton Keynes: Middle England/Edge City. Cass.
Clapson, M. (2013). Anglo-American Crossroads: Urban Planning and Research in Britain, 1940-2010. Bloomsbury.
Clapson, M. (2014). The Wider Context. In H. Meller (Ed.), The Plan for Milton Keynes (pp. 1–26). Routledge.
Coleman, R., Lebbon, C., Clarkson, J., & Keates, S. (2003). From Margins to Mainstream. In J. Clarkson, S. Keates, R. Coleman, & C. Lebbon (Eds.), Inclusive Design: Design for the Whole Population (pp. 1–25). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0001-0_1
Cross, N. (1975). Design and Technology: Man-made Futures Unit 9. The Open University Press.
Cross, N., Elliott, D., & Roy, R. (1974). Man-made Futures: Readings in Society, Technology and Design. The Open University Press.
Edwards, M. (2001). City Design: What Went Wrong at Milton Keynes? Journal of Urban Design, 6(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800120032905
Finkelstein, V. (1981). To Deny or Not to Deny Disability—What is Disability? In A. Brechin, P. Liddiard, & J. Swain (Eds.), Handicap in a Social World (pp. 34–37). The Open University Press.
Finkelstein, V. (1998). Emancipatory Disability Studies. In T. Shakespeare (Ed.), The Disability Reader: Social Science Perspectives (pp. 28-51). Cassell.
Finkelstein, V. (2001). A Personal Journey into Disability Politics. https://www.independentliving.org/docs3/finkelstein01a.pdf
Fry, T. (2011). Design as Politics. Berg.
Hall, P. (2014). “And One Fine Morning –”: Reflections on a Double Centenary. The Town Planning Review, 85(5), 557–562. https://doi.org/l0.3828/tpr.2014.34
Hamraie, A. (2012). Universal Design Research as a New Materialist Practice. Disability Studies Quarterly, 32(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v32i4.3246
Heylighen, A., & Bianchin, M. (2013). How Does Inclusive Design Relate to Good Design? Designing as a Deliberative Enterprise. Design Studies, 34(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2012.05.002
Hillier, B., Penn, A., & Dalton, N. (1992). Milton Keynes: Look Back to London. Architects Journal, 195(3), 42–46.
Imrie, R. (2012). Universal Design and Equitable Access to the Built Environment. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34(10), 873–882. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.624250
Jones, J. C. (1970). Design Methods: Seeds of Human Futures (2nd Ed.). Wiley.
Llewelyn-Davies, R., Weeks, J., Forestier-Walker, R., & Bor, W. (2014). The Plan for Milton Keynes. Routledge.
Luck, R. (2018). Inclusive Design and Making in Practice: Bringing Bodily Experience into Closer Contact with Making. Design Studies, 54, 96–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.11.003
Mace, R. L., Hardie, G. J., & Place, J. P. (1996). Accessible Environments: Toward Universal Design. North Carolina State University.
Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Planning Problems are Wicked Problems. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.
Shakespeare, T. (2010). The Social Model of Disability. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The Disability Studies Reader (pp. 266–273). Routledge.
Sutherland, A. (2011, December 16). Vic Finkelstein: Academic and Disability Activist, Obituary. The Independent. www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/vic-finkelstein-academic-anddisability-activist-6277679.html
Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation, & The Disability Alliance. (1976). The Fundamental Principles of Disability. https://disabledpeoplesarchive.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/39/2021/01/001-FundamentalPrinciplesOfDisability-UPIAS-DA-22Nov1975.pdf
Walker, D. (1982). The Architecture and Planning of Milton Keynes. The Architectural Press.
Webber, M. M. (1963). Order in Diversity: Community without Propinquity. In L. Wirigo (Ed.), Cities and Space. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Webber, M. M. (1964). The Urban Place and the Nonplace Urban Realm. In M. M. Webber (Ed.), Explorations into Urban Structure (pp. 79-153). University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.9783/9781512808063-005